Why can't they repair the damage caused by Elon Musk renaming Twitter to X?

He made it ok to post porn (which, to be fair, was already happening). He promised a dating site. And has talked about making it a financial services site — as if anyone trusts a guy with hundreds of billions of dollars but skips out on both rent and child support.

Compared with all that stuff, renaming one of the most distinctive brands in tech so it sounds like a low-rent porn site is little more than an oopsie.

Twitter always struggled to make money. Elon talked about replacing an ad-based model with subscriptions, but that failed in every iteration he tried. He’s now pushing some incomprehensible package deal where you get “verified” and some free ads in exchange for a flat monthly fee. The only advertisers who will go for that are the scams that need a thin veneer of credibility.

Why did Cartman love Heidi purely with heart, her being the first one he ever did, but then one day Butters tells him that all women are manipulative and then he began to believe that she was a bad person and pretended to be a victim?

On the other hand, firing the Moderation team was the strategic equivalent of shooting himself in the face. And then he compounded the problem by telling advertisers to “GFY.”

Except, you know, he didn’t use the acronym.

That was one of the dumbest branding decisions I’ve ever seen, but the “damage” is probably limited to mockery.

Who believes that Speaker Mike Johnson will certify ‘a free and fair and legal election'? Who believes that Speaker Mike Johnson will NOT certify ‘a free and fair and legal election'? Why?

Meanwhile, he’s so desperate to pump up his fading user numbers that he’s pushing the “blue checks” who really belong on Truth Social into everyone’s For You feed. The resulting increase in Views may make the right-wing nut jobs happy, but it scares off any advertiser thinking of returning because no one wants their ads next to some guy screaming about the need to kill all the (insert minority group here).